When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.

Dracvlad wrote:

Linus Gorp wrote:

baltec1 wrote:

Lucas Kell wrote:

Because it was a younger game still in it's natural growth cycle. You're literally stating that you think masses of people only stayed playing this game because gankers exist, and you provide absolutely no evidence to that.

Way more evidence than you have for your agenda.

If you wipe out large amounts of content then of course you are going to see the population drop. The changes made over the last 5-6 years has reduced the content available in highsec which means highsec is a lot more boring.

Lucas Kell wrote:

Why is it global temperatures are increasing as the number of pirates is diminishing? Two completely unrelated statistics and the desperation of people to draw causal links where none exist, that's why.

A reduction in content goes with a reduction in players. Very simple to see the connection here.

Want some advice? Arguing with Lucas isn't going to get you anywhere. You can throw all the facts you want in his face. You can show him indisputable evidence. He's still going to keep arguing for his narrow-minded point of view and will try to proof you wrong.

What facts and what indisputable evidence, I have seen none, nothing, zero. If you are relying on that 1% comment then I have a courier contract to a citadel you can do for me...

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.

Dracvlad wrote:

Linus Gorp wrote:

It wasn't in relation to anything said here, as I didn't bother reading it.
Many people have tried arguing with Lucas before, including me. We've proven him wrong on so many occasions, but he's just living in his tiny little dream world and the only facts he deems worthwhile are those supporting his opinion.

You don't bother reading what he said Well how the hell can you make a judgement on him

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.